Every Phuket off-plan villa is sold on the same promise: pay in stages, and in eighteen months or so the house exists. Most of the time it does. But the promise is only as good as the company making it, and this month the Thai Real Estate Association said on the record that the next twelve months will sort developers with real money from developers running on yours. The obvious reading is that Phuket off-plan is now risky. The more useful reading is that it has always been two markets wearing one brochure, and the questions below are how you tell which one you are standing in.
What the Bangkok Post reported
On 10 September the Bangkok Post carried statements from the president of the Thai Real Estate Association, Pornarit Chounchaisit, and from the managing director of SET-listed Sena Development. The residential slump, he said, will run into 2027. Mortgage rejection rates at some large developers have surged to 70 percent. Many listed developers “can sustain operations for no more than a year.” International demand has gone quiet. And Phuket, which had drawn Bangkok developers of every size to launch condos and villas for foreign buyers, “has started to slow amid the government’s crackdown on nominee ownership.”
One more detail worth knowing: a developer sitting on completed, unsold units for more than three years pays land and building tax on them, and the rate rises with each revaluation. Unsold stock is not neutral. It costs money to hold.
Why the 70 percent figure is not your problem
That number is about Thai borrowers being refused Thai mortgages, and it is reported by some large Bangkok developers, not the industry as a whole. If you are buying in Phuket from Australia, the UK, Singapore or Dubai, you are almost certainly paying cash or borrowing at home. Whether a freelance architect in Bangkok can get a home loan does not change your purchase.
What does change your purchase is the line about developers and their runway. An off-plan villa is a contract with a company to build something over a period of years. The question has never been whether Phuket villas are a good idea. It is whether this company will still be standing when yours is due.
Question one: who actually owns the land?
Ask to see the title deed, and check whose name is on it. Some of the strongest developers on this island are Thai companies that bought their land outright with their own money. That is the best possible answer. Other projects sit on land held under an option, a long lease, or through a related party, and each of those adds a link in the chain between your money and your house. None is automatically a problem. All are things to know before you pay, not after. If the answer involves a nominee structure on the developer side, read my piece on the nominee crackdown and then think hard.
Question two: where does the construction money come from?
There are three answers: the developer’s own capital, a bank facility, or the buyers’ stage payments. Most projects are a blend. Be wary when the emphasis is on the third, because then your deposit is not sitting in reserve for your villa. It is buying concrete for the villa two doors down, and that owner’s next payment is buying yours. Thailand has an escrow law, but using it is voluntary. Ask whether the project does, where your money sits between payments and who can touch it. A developer with nothing to hide will answer in a sentence.
Question three: what does the payment schedule tell you?
Read it one way only. There are developers on this island who will run a payment plan over several years, because they are not waiting on your instalment to pour the next slab. That kind of patience is hard to fake, and it tells you something good. A standard schedule tells you nothing either way; plenty of well-funded developers hold firm terms precisely because they do not need your sale, and you should not read a refusal to negotiate as a warning. The flag is the schedule that wants a large slice before the ground is broken, with the balance in tight steps tied to “progress” that only the developer defines and nobody independent certifies. That is a developer asking you to be the bank, and you should price the job accordingly.
Question four: what have they finished?
Not launched. Finished. Go and stand in a completed project by the same company and look at the finish in year two, not the render on day one. Talk to an owner if you can; owners are candid in ways sales galleries are not. A first-time developer is not disqualified, but a first-time developer asking for a front-loaded schedule on land they do not own outright is three questions answered badly in one sentence.
Question five: what happens if they are late, or stop?
Read the contract for the word “delay” and see what follows it. You are looking for four things: a completion date, a defined grace period, what the developer owes you if it is missed, and how and when you get your money back if the project stops. A serious developer has these written down because they expect to be held to them. A contract that lets the developer extend “for reasons beyond its control” without defining those reasons, and gives you nothing in return, only works if everything goes to plan. Those are precisely the contracts written when everything was going to plan.
What it means for a buyer
A slowing market does not lower the quality of the best developers; it exposes the rest. The companies with land, capital and a track record are not the ones the Association is worried about, and they are not about to start discounting. Do not expect them to.
Where there is leverage, it sits with the developer who needs the sale, and that is exactly where the risk sits too. A discount from a company that cannot finish is not a discount. Treat an unusually keen price as a reason to ask the five questions harder, not as the answer to them.
None of this is exotic. It is the same diligence you would do on a builder at home, applied to a market where the paperwork is in Thai and the building is ten thousand kilometres from your desk. That is the gap a Phuket property advisor exists to close.
What it means for an owner
If your villa is finished and titled, the next year works in your favour. Completion certainty is now a selling point: a buyer comparing your villa to an off-plan alternative is comparing a house to a promise. Say so in your marketing. If you are holding an off-plan contract in a project running behind, talk to someone before your next stage payment falls due. Your position is strongest while the money is still in your account.
The read
The Bangkok Post story is not a warning about Phuket villas. It is a warning about paying for one without knowing who is on the other side of the contract. The island has developers who own their land, fund their own builds and can wait years for your final payment, and it has developers who need your deposit by Friday. In a rising market both types finish. We are no longer in that market, so the questions above are no longer optional. For the wider picture, start with my mid-2026 market review.
If you are weighing an off-plan villa and want the developer checked before you commit, message me on WhatsApp: +66 93 760 8561.
Source: Bangkok Post, “Residential market likely to face prolonged slump,” 10 September 2026. The 70 percent mortgage rejection figure is as reported by some large developers to the Thai Real Estate Association and is not an industry-wide statistic.
Rex Butler, Managing Director, Butler Estates. This is general market commentary, not legal, tax or investment advice.
Looking for something specific?
Tell me what you need and I’ll come back with options that match. If I don’t have the answer to something, I’ll tell you, then I’ll go and get it. No obligation, no pressure.
